I don’t agree because POWER is a dominant commodity in relationships which are inherently…

…e use of violence to control women and to keep other men away from “our” woman becomes unnecessary. When a bunch of men and women are deeply bonded by sex and romantic love, social hierarchies based on male power cannot be established, just like happens with bonobos. Then gender equality comes naturally. Therefore, polyamory eliminates in one full sweep gender inequality, violence against women and viol…
Polyamory, feminism and the Myth of the Noble Savage
321
14
Hermes Solenzol
@Cezjah (Cecil (CJ) John)
·Follow
1 min read·
Jan 13, 2020
--
I don’t agree because POWER is a dominant commodity in relationships which are inherently transactional. Whether it’s physical or fiscal power, it’s not distributed in an egalitarian manner across men or gender.
--
--
Written by @Cezjah (Cecil (CJ) John)873 Followers
·1.8K Following
Architect | Computer Scientist | Mentor | Entrepreneur | Author > FinTech, Philosophy, Psychology, Affective Neuroscience, Fiction
Responses (1)
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Terms
Text to speech
Teams